Success Stories

OFFICER’S INCONSISTENCIES MEAN “NOT GUILTY”

Mr. H. had pulled his car over to the curb to talk to a neighbor, when suddenly he was confronted by several police officers, who arrested both of them. Mr. H. was charged with a DUI. Because of his driving background, Mr. H. was faced with license revocation if found guilty of the DUI.

Attorney Wallin took the case to trial. The Court found Mr. H. not guilty of all charges, noting that the two officers who testified contradicted each other, and their own tickets, whereas Mr. H.’s testimony was consistent with one of the officers. That, combined with a lack of evidence of erratic driving, field sobriety testing or breath or chemical testing, led the court to find Mr. H. not guilty.

Previously, Attorney Wallin obtained a rescission of Mr. H.’s statutory summary suspension.